Earth Notes: On the AQE Air Quality Egg: Review (2013)Updated 2020-08-17 02:46 GMT.
- Reviewed by: Damon Hart-Davis on 2013-05-24.
- Somewhat flaky, but seemed to basically work.
- Regularly sampled various air-quality measures such as temperature, humidity, NO2, CO and particulates/dust. Reported those live/publicly for access over the Internet. (No longer in use a few months on.)
- Rating: 3 out of 5.
I'm not keen on biomass combustion with inadequate flue filtering, reducing air quality and general health and starting to undo the good work of the Clear Air Acts. I'm particularly unkeen on biomass burning in built-up areas where the downsides are amplified. (It is possible to detect the combustion products of trendy real fires in Islingston fireplaces on cold weekends, I'm told.)
To that end I'm interested in measuring (live) and getting into the public domain and making widely available air-quality data for London and beyond. Thus this mini project!
Ordered from Wicked Devices in the US 2013-04-30 two AQEs with dust sensor add-on for USD486 total (AQE@USD185, dust sensor @USD58); no P&P charge. Arrived 2013-05-09. First AQE set up indoors and put on-line 2013-05-13 (also visible here). She second AQE was set up outside and a little distance away and put on-line 2013-06-03 (also visible here). The AQEs came in decent robust packaging that survived international transit!
Immediate bugbears first:
- The AQE that I have set up regularly stops publishing to the Internet (after as little as a few minutes to a few hours). The sensor and base unit have to be power-cycled together to reconnect. As of 2013-05-24 the system has managed its longest run without needing hand-holding of well over 24h. Could be a problem if a fit-and-forget system is needed.
- What's with the blindingly-bright lights? My router (into which the base unit has to be plugged) is in the master bedroom and I've had to hide the base unit down the back of furniture and swathe it in dark cloth to avoid it keeping us awake—possibly even a fire hazard. The ability to turn off the light show at least at night would be welcome.
- Even the sensor unit has lights, but less bright. If I hang the sensor unit outside I fear that it may become a magnet for the light-fingered. No value to them but expensive to replace.
- Needing to have a mains supply to the sensor unit is a pain. I've just been building Arduino compatible (ATmega328P-based) hardware that runs a variety of sensors and a radio for a few tens of microamps; good to run off a couple of NiMH rechargables for a couple of years. The more complex AQE sensors may make that difficult, but swapping batteries occasionally could well be less pain than the mains tether (and running out of a house with air-tightness measures).
- The first AQE was showing on their map initially, but as of 2013-05-24 is not, which is worrying. And then a little later as I write, it's back...
- Inside, lying on its side as suggested, after a while the AQE reads ~5°C over actual temperatures from self-heating (which is also worrying from a power-consumption point of view). This also makes the (relative) humidity reading somewhat suspect (low).
- It does not seem possible to change location of indoor/outdoor metadata after initial set-up, at least through the AQE home-page or similar, which means that redeploying a AQE may mislead users of its public data.
- The provision of US adapters (albeit with a 100V--240V voltage range) required me to go and buy a bunch of shaver adapters.
- The power-adapter cables are perhaps a bit short for realistic deployment.
First Steps: end 2013-05
Having observed the AQE running as-is for over a week, my next task is over the next few days at the end of May. It is to try to automate fetching of the published AQE data from Xively and republishing on a local page, live, possibly integrated with additional data from elsewhere.
Measured Power Consumption
- Base unit: ~2.2W
- Sensor unit: ~2.8W
I tried running the AQEs at school to measure temperature and particulates but a number of problems intervened. From huge leaf/dander shed from a nearby tree, to reconfiguration of the school's networking preventing data egress. Then I had difficulty fetching the data from Xively.
As a result the AQE experiment lapsed. The AQEs now lie unused gathering dust!
A reasonable rule of thumb as of at least about 2017 is that anything detecting particulates with any accuracy is going to use several watts (to drive a fan) and cost hundreds of pounds. Other environmental parameters can be a lot less power- and money- hungry to measure, temperature in particular. But the device must be careful not to self-heat to avoid messing up even that!
I haven't used any of this stuff in years now, and it has indeed gathered dust. When the current lockdown is over, this is going to WEEE recycling.